Cci subsonic 22lr review11/18/2023 l The retained-weight column shows the recovered bullet weight as a percentage of the actual bullet weight. l To calculate IPSC power factor, multiply bullet weight in grains by the velocity in fps, then divide by 1000. For accuracy, we fired the test gun from a benchrest at a 15-yard target. l The accuracy figures are the average of two five-shot groups. Notes: Average Velocity and standard deviation readings were obtained by firing four five-shot strings over a Competition Electronics Pro Chrono. 22 Rimfire Load Performance Data Gun: S&W M17 (K-22) w/ 6-in. We tested the loads at 15 yards because we were using iron-sighted handguns. While we place a premium on accuracy, all of the loads tested were accurate enough for small-game hunting. A viable choice for all-round hunting use is the CCI Mini Mag. The best hunting load, we believe, is the Federal Small Game Match load. There is a great deal of difference in performance between the CCI Quiet load, as an example, and the CCI Stinger, but each rates an A because they perform as designed in a niche role. We rated the cartridges based on what they were designed to do. In the end we isolated a number of very versatile loads for specific chores and other loads that do a number of things well. We also tested a number of select 22 loads with the Ruger Standard Model. Since self-loaders demand high-velocity loads, the revolver eliminated any concern with function and allowed us to test 22 Short, CB Cap, and Quiet type loads without concern. The primary firearm used was the Smith & Wesson Model 17, also known as the K-22, with a 6-inch barrel. We tested first for accuracy and then for penetration, along with standard metrics of accuracy, expanded diameter, and retained weight. We used our standard 6-inch-wide water jugs. While there have been plenty of tests of accuracy and velocity with this round, we set out to test penetration and expansion. The 22 rimfire is a great small-game round that offers excellent accuracy in the right handgun. On the other hand, during a test of self-loading pistols a few months ago, we fired 1600 22 Long Rifle cartridges from several makers without a single malfunction or failure to fire.įor this test we were looking at some of the better choices for hunting with the 22 round. Others will have the bullet bent in the cartridge case, which complicates feeding. It isn’t unusual for a brick of 500 cartridges to contain several cartridges that misfire and do not ignite, even with a hard primer hit. Also, the heel-based bullet sometimes is damaged when feeding in a semi-auto firearm. The 22 rimfire firing system isn’t as reliable as a centerfire system. It isn’t all about limited wound potential. For this reason, many of us do not recommend the 22 LR ever be considered for personal defense. This is an old design, using not only rimfire construction but also a heel-based bullet. The Center-X obliterates anything cheaper than it and, in my best rifle, beats substantially higher cost stuff from other makers as well.The most popular and most produced cartridge in America is the 22 Long Rifle. In my rifles, I shoot the CCI SV stuff much of the time and Lapua Center-X when I am serious. Depending on which rifle and lot of ammo, the CCI SV actually outshoots the lower level Wolf / SK stuff as well as fed 711b much of the time at substantially less cost. Since the demise of the Eley / Aguila purple box sport stuff (which was also a great value and is much missed), there is nothing near it in performance. If your willing to go a step up, CCI Standard Velocity in the cardboard 500rd bricks is an incredible value. The Wildcat is also the second most reliable feeding of any of these behind the Remington which is the most reliable but also poorest accuracy. My MK Ii match pistol is fed mostly Winchester wildcat. I refuse to shoot plated garbage in any of my guns. For the really cheap HV stuff, I have found Winchester Wildcat to outshoot CCI blazer, federal lightning, remington TB, and certainly any plated garbage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |